freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: JDBC driver and Sourceforge
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 07:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Hi all,
Although my domain is the C libraries, I thought I'd weigh in here.
I understand that Craig is hesitant to include patches he doesn't have
the proper time to test, and his time is limited. But, also that there
are some important patches out there in the queue and development has been
at a stand still for quite some time.
If you guys (Java folk), do set up a CVS at sourceforge, make sure it is
called something different, so that it is clear that while it may be based
on Craigs work, it is not Craigs work.
Brian
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Stevenson, Chris (SSABSA) wrote:
> > Some time ago it was mentioned that the JDBC driver should be moved to
> > sourceforge because the development wasn't moving as fast as the perl
> > version. I would like to mention it again. The driver hasn't
> > been updated
> > since march. Bugs have been found and patches have been sent
> > (at least I
> > did, sent a patch for the MS SQL 4096 text limit) and nothing
> > has happened.
> > Maybe by moving it to sourceforge things will speed up a little.
>
> I am sitting on a version that supports cursors (scrollable
> and updatable recordsets) and is built using apache's Ant,
> rather thatn the ad-hoc method in the urrent snapshots. It
> is quite extensively refactored from the current version.
>
> What is the opinion of the maintainers and other members of
> the list on making this available at SourceForge?
>
> Would it be stepping on any toes to do so?
>
> chris stevenson
>
-
JDBC driver and Sourceforge,
Spectron Caribe, Inc., 08/07/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: JDBC driver and Sourceforge, Stevenson, Chris (SSABSA), 08/07/2001
- RE: JDBC driver and Sourceforge, Brian Bruns, 08/08/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.