FreeTDS Development Group

[Martin Spott <Martin.Spott AT uni-duisburg.de>]

Hi,
I was really wondering for quite a while - and it took until now to have a
look at it:

'internetcds.com' obviously has at least two different gateways of which one
has sort of restricted access. I did a traceroute from different points:

Functional:

gluehbirne: 11:16:22 ~> /usr/sbin/traceroute freetds.internetcds.com
traceroute to freetds.internetcds.com (63.163.68.120), 30 hops max, 40 byte 
packets
 1  62.225.255.9 (62.225.255.9)  47 ms  48 ms  47 ms
 2  62.225.255.10 (62.225.255.10)  48 ms  46 ms  48 ms
 3  F-gw12.F.net.DTAG.DE (194.25.6.73)  132 ms  134 ms  132 ms
 4  Penns-gw12.USA.net.DTAG.DE (194.25.6.106)  135 ms  138 ms  134 ms
 5  sl-bb13-pen-6-0-TS6.sprintlink.net (144.232.247.1)  135 ms  136 ms  135 ms
 6  sl-bb21-pen-13-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.5.233)  135 ms  137 ms  137 ms
 7  sl-bb23-pen-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.16.30)  135 ms  136 ms  135 ms
 8  sl-bb22-kc-13-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.18.233)  166 ms  168 ms  167 ms
 9  sl-bb20-kc-14-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.2.129)  167 ms  168 ms  167 ms
10  sl-bb20-che-4-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.50)  180 ms  179 ms  180 ms
11  sl-gw11-che-9-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.15.146)  180 ms  179 ms  180 ms
12  sl-cdsnet-5-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.139.66)  206 ms  205 ms  206 ms
13  freetds.internetcds.com (63.163.68.120)  204 ms  206 ms  206 ms


Non-functional:

foehn: 11:16:39 ~> traceroute freetds.internetcds.com
traceroute to freetds.internetcds.com (204.118.244.99), 30 hops max, 40 byte 
packets
 1  dialup2.oche.de (194.94.252.2)  28 ms  25 ms  26 ms
 2  lancom.oche.de (194.94.253.7)  24 ms  23 ms  24 ms
 3  ochede.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (134.130.79.9)  54 ms  51 ms  51 ms
 4  c6k-rz.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (134.130.79.252)  53 ms  50 ms  50 ms
 5  cisco-rz.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (137.226.144.1)  52 ms  52 ms  50 ms
 6  cisco-gwin.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE (137.226.38.5)  86 ms  74 ms  66 ms
 7  ar-aachen1.g-win.dfn.de (188.1.43.193)  58 ms  66 ms  57 ms
 8  cr-koeln1.g-win.dfn.de (188.1.84.33)  58 ms  64 ms  68 ms
 9  cr-hannover1.g-win.dfn.de (188.1.18.9)  79 ms  73 ms  138 ms
10  ir-nyc2.g-win.dfn.de (188.1.18.62)  155 ms  153 ms  150 ms
11  212.1.201.36 (212.1.201.36)  139 ms  144 ms  149 ms
12  500.POS3-0.GW5.NYC9.ALTER.NET (157.130.254.241)  140 ms  148 ms  146 ms
13  520.at-5-0-0.XR2.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.22)  164 ms  147 ms *
14  0.so-4-0-0.TR2.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.15.182)  352 ms  150 ms  159 ms
15  125.ATM6-0.TR2.SEA1.ALTER.NET (146.188.140.94)  246 ms  238 ms  259 ms
16  198.ATM7-0.XR2.SEA4.ALTER.NET (146.188.200.213)  327 ms  258 ms  257 ms
17  192.ATM8-0-0.GW1.POR2.ALTER.NET (146.188.200.189)  252 ms  270 ms  235 ms
18  cdsnet-2-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.177.198)  254 ms  247 ms  276 ms
19  * * *


Anyone with similar experiences ?

Cheers,
        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------