freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Eric Mountain" <e.mountain AT dev.amadeus.net>
- To: "TDS Development Group" <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: JDBC bug?
- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:13:36 +0100
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Spannring <cts AT internetcds.com>
To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Friday, 25 February, 2000 15:57
Subject: [freetds] Re: JDBC bug?
> > Sorry, thread safety considerations seemed to be implied by your earlier
> > response. As it turns out JDBC objects are required to be thread safe
> > anyway.
>
>Actually, someone else (Eric Mountain) wrote that.
Yep, and sorry, because I confused 2 issues - what I really should have said
was what Craig said which was that we wanted the ability to have multiple
Statement objects on the same Connection which TDS doesn't support unless
you have separate physical connections for each Statement.
Cheers,
:E
-
JDBC bug?,
Betty Chang, 02/24/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: JDBC bug?, Eric Mountain, 02/24/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Brett Knights, 02/24/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Craig Spannring, 02/24/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Brett Knights, 02/24/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Craig Spannring, 02/25/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Betty Chang, 02/26/2000
- Re: JDBC bug?, Eric Mountain, 02/29/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.