FreeTDS Development Group

["Geoff Winkless" <geoff AT farmline.com>]

"Francis Smit" <francis AT oztel.com> writes:


> Hmmm, I had it with TDSVER=4.2, but no prob with, numerics
> and it can handle that funny data type fine if the table has only a
> few <= 40 fields. anyhow, these probs could still be related.

Yeah, this is the problem I posted a while back (see "timestamp data fields
(13 Dec 1999)" on the archive). I did try and find a solution but ran out of
time (in the end, I just specified fields instead).

Suffice it to say that I ended up traversing what seemed like half the code
and found that the column structure gets horribly corrupted -somewhere- when
you handle these guid fields.

Hope you have better luck than I did :(

Geoff