Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

community_studios - [Community_studios] Re: [seul-edu] Donated Computers Issue (cont'd)

community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of all things related to Public Domain

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: tom poe <tompoe AT renonevada.net>
  • To: seul-edu AT seul.org, Roger Dingledine <arma AT mit.edu>
  • Cc: "CommStudios" <community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Reno_Perl_Group" <renotahoe-pm AT pm.org>
  • Subject: [Community_studios] Re: [seul-edu] Donated Computers Issue (cont'd)
  • Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:13:18 -0700

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 21:45, Roger Dingledine wrote:

> I mean, their statement is false -- I buy my computers from a fine
> place called www.kc-computers.com (for example, that's where I got the
> machine running seul.org), and when I say "no operating system please"
> he's just fine with that. But there's a big difference between "I'm an
> exception so your statement isn't totally correct" and "Your statement
> doesn't apply to anybody."
>
> Hm.
>
> --Roger

Hi: You answered your own question, I think. Microsoft is putting the word
out, that any and all computers must retain the original OS for the life of
the computer. Period. No consideration for your situation. No
consideration for any other situation. That, is misleading those who cannot
afford to question, e.g., schools, libraries, public institutions,
nonprofits, and the list goes on. A fair web site would specify that the
following information applies to M$ products only. Then, it would be up to
someone to test the EULA in court, as to whether they are over-reaching.
Who's going to spend the money? Until some organization does, what we have
in front of us, is a dampening, and a disastrous dampening of the concept we
know as donation of computers to those who so desperately need them. Did you
see the article that mentioned " - - - Most recyclers, he says, "want to lay
low and not take MS on," which is of course a perfectly prudent point of
view. His organisation gets donated computers, then finds itself buying and
installing new software even when it's "pretty sure" the software on the
machine is licensed already. He also points out that it's difficult and more
expensive to source older operating software that will actually run on older
machines, because Microsoft pushes its new software, which won't."

That, amounts to raising the cost of most computers donated by 100%, right?
In other words, we are seeing a significant cut of half of the donated
computer market for no other reason than some M$ crappola, which means half
of those that might benefit from a donated computer, will lose out,
altogether. Why? This is the same company that donated so much money to
bringing affordable research and drugs to Africa. The next step they took,
was to send in auditors, and shut down those clinics that did not present
proper records and paperwork. People die when their medicine gets shut off
without notice!

As for your comment that there's "a big difference between "I'm an
exception so your statement isn't totally correct" and "Your statement
doesn't apply to anybody."". I'd like you to think about whether a better
way to put it, is, there's a big difference between "Your statement applies
to everyone" and "Your statement does not apply to donated equipment, unless
it contains your software/OS, and then it does not apply to any hardware,
until you legally establish such."
Thanks,
Tom Poe
http://www.studioforrecording.org/
http://www.ibiblio.org/studioforrecording/
http://renotahoe.pm.org/



  • [Community_studios] Re: [seul-edu] Donated Computers Issue (cont'd), tom poe, 05/01/2002

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page