community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of all things related to Public Domain
List archive
[Community_studios] Re: Fwd: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front...
- From: Alex <alex AT synchcorp.com>
- To: tompoe AT renonevada.net
- Cc: CommStudios <community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Reno_Perl_Group <renotahoe-pm AT pm.org>, "S. Martinez" <sal.martinez AT charter.net>
- Subject: [Community_studios] Re: Fwd: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front...
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:55:55 -0500
I would concur.
tom poe wrote:
> Hi: And, so said Nicolas.
> thanks,
> tom
>
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> Subject: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front...
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:09:12 -0400
> From: Nicolas Marchildon <nicolas AT marchildon.net>
> To: seul-edu AT seul.org
>
> tom poe écrivait/wrote:
> > We are thinking, today, about whether the server will be Debian, or
> > Slackware. Any consensus out there, yet?
>
> If I had to choose between Slackware and Debian, I would definetely go with
> Debian, as it's much easier to upgrade. It has considerable importance when
> you have to manage many computers. I can't live without APT.
>
> Slackware's package management is too basic. It's much more difficult than
> typing "apt-get upgrade".
>
> RedHat also has an automated tool for updating the system (called
> "up2date"),
> but I found it less reliable, and much slower. APT has obviously been there
> for a long time.
>
> Nicolas
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
-
[Community_studios] Fwd: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front...,
tom poe, 04/25/2002
- [Community_studios] Re: Fwd: Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front..., Alex, 04/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.