Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

community_studios - [Community_studios] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] Is New Amendment needed? (was: Intel Continues to DO IT RIGHT!)

community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of all things related to Public Domain

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anatoly Volynets <anatoly AT total-knowledge.com>
  • To: tompoe AT renonevada.net, Seth Johnson <seth.johnson AT realmeasures.dyndns.org>, "Matthew T. Russotto" <mrussotto AT speakeasy.net>
  • Cc: dmca_discuss AT lists.microshaft.org, "CommStudios" <community_studios AT lists.ibiblio.org>, "Reno_Perl_Group" <renotahoe-pm AT pm.org>
  • Subject: [Community_studios] Re: [DMCA_Discuss] Is New Amendment needed? (was: Intel Continues to DO IT RIGHT!)
  • Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:28:27 -0700

On Friday 12 April 2002 09:59 am, tom poe wrote:
> On Friday 12 April 2002 05:37, Seth Johnson wrote:
> > Matthew:
> >
> > Build constituency.
> >
> > Seth Johnson
>
> Hi: That's twice I've seen you use that phrase. Can we expand on that?
> Does it mean, let's spread the word and convert others to thinking there's
> a problem that needs to be addressed? Is it a marketing idea, plan,
> strategy? Thanks,
> Tom
> _______________________________________________

Hi Tom,

We went a little astray here, didn't we? It was my assumption linked here,
which I would like to outline one more time:

1. All legal mess around IP is related to certain understanding of ideas and
works of art, which liken them to the private property.
2. Based on that big IP holders made already happen some laws (BTW, who
knows exactly,how many?) which strangle cultural development and normal
cultural life in whole.
3. They have done this, they continue to do this, and they will proceed, why
not?
4. On the other hand, this all has been done based on US Constitution, which
states: 'The Congress shall have Power...
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited
Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective
Writings and Discoveries; '
5. So I come to conclusion that above statement must be clarified by another
Amendment, so: a) no other copyright extension or copy protection measures
would happen again; b) all existing laws of that kind may become clearly
unconstitutional.
6. To make it happen it is necessary, first of all, to agree upon the
solution: is this new Amendment needed?

Anatoly
>
> ------------------------
> http://www.anti-dmca.org
> ------------------------
>
> DMCA_Discuss mailing list
> DMCA_Discuss AT lists.microshaft.org
> http://lists.microshaft.org/mailman/listinfo/dmca_discuss




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page