cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
- From: Adrian Midgley <dr.midgley AT homefieldsurgery.nhs.uk>
- To: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- Cc: cc-uk <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:18:39 +0100
Rob Myers wrote:
The reaction is already visible.the CC licence, while paying lip service to its "inspiration". This adds the
substantial overhead of understanding what the differences are, why, and
whether they are tolerable.
They seem also to have felt it necessary to create their own derivative of
This is the "everyone must have their own license" antipattern that is causing so much trouble in the Open Source Software world at the moment. The BBC could also be seen as being guilty of this.
Some of these orgs will be correct, I don't recall seeing a variant of the CC licence that requires providing a file copy for information to the previous author of a work that is modified (I may just have missed it of course).
If they do identify a clear lack, then a new variant should arise as a result.
-
[Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
Jonathan Mitchell, 06/12/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
Cory Doctorow, 06/12/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
J. Grant, 06/19/2005
-
RE: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
David Hirst, 06/19/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
Rob Myers, 06/19/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website, Adrian Midgley, 06/21/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
J. Grant, 06/21/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website, Ian Drysdale, 06/22/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
Rob Myers, 06/19/2005
-
RE: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
David Hirst, 06/19/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
J. Grant, 06/19/2005
-
Re: [Cc-uk] Proposed 'CC in the UK' website,
Cory Doctorow, 06/12/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.