Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-se - [Cc-se] [Fwd: Re: [Cc-de] Choice of Law]

cc-se AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: development of iCommons Sweden licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter Brink <peter.brink AT brinkdata.se>
  • To: "cc-se AT lists.ibiblio.org" <cc-se AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Cc-se] [Fwd: Re: [Cc-de] Choice of Law]
  • Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:12:07 +0200

Ang. diskussionen om en lagvals klausul i slutet av augusti.

Jag frågade författarna av den tyska översättningen av cc licenserna varför de valt att använda en lagvalsklausul, här är svaret...

-------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
Ämne: Re: [Cc-de] Choice of Law
Datum: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:55:18 +0200
Från: Till Jaeger <till.jaeger AT ifross.de>
Till: Peter Brink <peter.brink AT brinkdata.se>
Kopia: cc-de AT lists.ibiblio.org
Hänvisar till: <4310396C.6070008 AT brinkdata.se>



Peter Brink schrieb:
At the Swedish CC list we are discussing whether or not to include a
choice of law clause in the Swedish license. The German license is one
of the 15 licenses that do have a choice of law clause, and I wonder
what considerations made the German drafters include such a clause?

The initial intention was to establish a license text effective under German law. We have considered the risk that German law could not be applicable without such choice of law clause. A license text effective under German law does make sense only in the case that German law is really applicable.

All the best for your CC project!

Till


________________________________________________

Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software (ifrOSS)
Linprunstraße 35 | 80335 München
Tel.: +49.89.211 871 0 | www.ifross.de
Dr. Till Jaeger
________________________________________________





  • [Cc-se] [Fwd: Re: [Cc-de] Choice of Law], Peter Brink, 09/19/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page