cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)
List archive
- From: Sam Stephens <sam AT postmoderncore.com>
- To: cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-sampling] attribution
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:12:04 +0900
It's great to see that there's CC licenses to allow sampling, and no surprise to see Negativland behind it.
I notice that all the licenses require attribution though - however I think it'd be nice to have a license that allows people to sample without attribution. Certainly I have pieces where if I attributed every sample I used, it'd take longer than actually having put the piece together. Also there I some I've done that I simply couldn't attribute now because I don't know where the samples came from. So I'm thinking it's probably hypocritical to license this stuff requiring Attribution. (In fact, possibly some of it I can't legally license, but nevermind).
I found it somewhat hypocritical when I saw the Beastie Boys had put their track on the Wired CD ( http://creativecommons.org/wired/ ) under the Noncommercial Sampling Plus license. Didn't they make their money and name commercially sampling stuff without attribution?
--
postmoderncore website (w/ mp3s & art)
http://postmoderncore.com/
dadashopping.net - art and words
http://dadashopping.net
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 6/05/2005
-
[cc-sampling] attribution,
Sam Stephens, 05/09/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-sampling] attribution, mark / negativland, 05/10/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.