cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)
List archive
- From: Don Joyce <dj AT webbnet.com>
- To: creative commons license list <cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [cc-sampling] a little more
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:47:22 -0700
Title: a little more
Oh, I forgot to add,
I keep perversely mentioning the need for separating the new
sampling license as something distinct from the old rather than an
addition to it, only because this new sampling license, in my mind,
mind you, is actually about lifting restrictions, not imposing them
-actually embodying an opposite sort of imperative to the many grades
of restrictions available in the old licenses. Many may want a
combination of both in a single license, and that's fine, but if one
actually does want to lift ALL restrictions on re-use except whole
work reproduction, [and this happens to be my ideal in terms of
copyright rights] it seems to me the sampling license would be better
sought as an alternative to existing license presumptions which
are actually all about potentially restricting partial re-use as well.
This is fine for any artist who wants such personal protections, but
those who wish to dump such personal protections are looking for an
alternative to existing licenses to begin with - which indeed is why
we're doing this now. Almost all our wording seems to be about
allowing, not restricting, right?
I also understand how this is so unwise on so many practicality
fronts that it's impossible to create an entirely new and separate
license for this, but I'm just registering my desire which is looking
for an alternative "license" that completely deregulates,
rather than clause options in an otherwise restriction regulating
license. ( and I realize and applaud that CC licenses are already a
welcome deregulation of traditional copyright law, but to move on to
complete deregulation, short of whole work reproduction as this
sampling license does, is actually to get rid of most of the
"licensing" concept as it stands, and might be considered
more like a badge of the de-licensed. That would be for those who want
it, and I'd be first in line.
Now, all ready to work with what we have nevertheless.
DJ
-
[cc-sampling] a little more,
Don Joyce, 07/27/2003
-
Re: [cc-sampling] a little more,
Glenn Otis Brown, 07/28/2003
-
Re: [cc-sampling] a little more,
mark / negativland, 07/29/2003
- Re: [cc-sampling] a little more, Glenn Otis Brown, 07/29/2003
-
Re: [cc-sampling] a little more,
mark / negativland, 07/29/2003
-
Re: [cc-sampling] a little more,
Glenn Otis Brown, 07/28/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.