Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Anthony <osm AT inbox.org>
  • To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>, kctucker AT gmail.com
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden
  • Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 12:47:59 -0400

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Anthony <osm AT inbox.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Kim Tucker <kctucker AT gmail.com> wrote:
The Libre Puro Licence is similar in the sense that it too does not
require attribution and is also copyleft.

I guess you could call it copyleft if you trust whoever defines "the Libre Knowledge Definition" to always properly define copyleft.

I don't.

Also, the really drastic difference between SA-1.0 and LPL is that LPL lets you add restrictions, so long as they're restrictions which are signed off by the people who define the LKD.  SA-1.0 doesn't allow you to add restrictions.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page