Development of Creative Commons licenses

[Diane Peters <diane AT creativecommons.org>]

Yep, thanks.  Consider the reference clarified.  We'll update the html accordingly.

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Luis Villa <luis AT tieguy.org> wrote:

Section 1(b) of b3 says "For purposes of this Public License, the
rights specified in Section 2(b)(1) and (2) are not Copyright and
Similar Rights."

I believe that the (2) here refers to Sec. 2(b)(2), not Sec. 2, but in
the HTML version of the license, "(2)" is hyperlinked/anchored to Sec.
2, not Sec. 2(b)(2).

So:
(1) The HTML version of the license needs to be fixed :)
(2) As a matter of drafting, it might be more precise to say "Sections
2(b)(1) and 2(b)(2)" instead of the current phrasing.

Hope that helps-
Luis
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses

In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community

-- 
Diane M. Peters, CC General Counsel

http://creativecommons.org/staff#dianepeters
diane AT creativecommons.org


______________________________________

Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be legal
advice nor should they be relied upon as, or represented to be legal
advice.  Creative Commons cannot and does not give legal advice. You
need to assess the suitability of Creative Commons tools for your
particular situation, which may include obtaining appropriate legal
advice from a licensed attorney.