cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:53:40 -0500
On Friday 13 January 2012 18:18:25 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Many licenses require that *accurate* credits be kept. This seems to
> be fine and acceptable (that is to say it's DFSG-free). On the other
> hand, if a license required *inaccurate* credit, I think it would be
> considered non-free. If this is the case, how can forbidding
> *accurate* credit be considered acceptable?
Why can't we look at it like this:
"This work based on a work licensed BY-SA (or whatever) by a person who has
requested his/her name not be mentioned in connection with this adaptation."
Would that fulfill the requirements of accurate credits and the license?
all the best,
drew
-
[cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden,
Francesco Poli, 01/13/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden, Rob Myers, 01/14/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden,
drew Roberts, 01/14/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden,
Francesco Poli, 01/21/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden, drew Roberts, 01/24/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Attribution: accurate credit should not be forbidden,
Francesco Poli, 01/21/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.