cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?

From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:59:14 -0400

On Wednesday 16 September 2009 13:25:33 jonathon wrote:
> As such, one
> can argue that "best practices" for NC content, is that it includes
> material that covers the content creators interpretation/understanding
> of the license.

Fine and dandy in the short term when there is one creator or creator group.
When you have a chain or net of NC using works drawing and building on one
another and each creator has a differing take on things?

all the best,

drew

[cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, Gregory Maxwell, 09/14/2009
- Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, James Grimmelmann, 09/15/2009
- Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, John Hendrik Weitzmann, 09/15/2009
- Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, Mike Linksvayer, 09/15/2009
  - Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, jonathon, 09/16/2009
    - Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, drew Roberts, 09/17/2009
      - Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, jonathon, 09/18/2009
- Re: [cc-licenses] How much "agreement" is needed about the meaning of a license?, jonathon, 09/16/2009