Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - [cc-licenses] buma/stemra

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: jonathon <jonathon.blake AT gmail.com>
  • To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [cc-licenses] buma/stemra
  • Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:50:22 +0000

All:

Did I understand the definition that buma/stemra is using for
"commercial" usage correctly?

http://www.bumastemra.nl/nl-NL/MuziekrechtenVastleggen/Flexibel+Collectief+Beheer/Werkdefinitie+Commercieel+Gebruik.htm

* Elk gebruik van het Werk door for-profit instellingen wordt als
'commercieel gebruik' aangemerkt.
( All usage by a for-profit organization is "commercial usage");
* Werk tegen betaling of andersoortige financiƫle vergoeding
(All usage that generates revenue is commercial usage.);
* 'commercieel gebruik' ... werk-, verkoop- en winkelruimtes ...
kerken, (dans-)scholen, instellingen voor welzijnswerk, en dergelijke.
( Commercial usage includes ... in a workplace, sales floor, or shop
space... churches, dance studios, health clinics, etc.);

Everything outside of those three example instances is
"non-commercial" and royalties are not required to be paid.

a) Did I miss any salient points of what constitutes "commercial"?

b) Did I misunderstand any of salient points of what constitutes "commercial"?

xan

jonathon



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page