cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: "Dana Powers" <dana.powers AT gmail.com>
- To: adam AT xs4all.nl, "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:59:19 -0700
CC does not assert copyright in the text of its licenses. However,
you should review the trademark policy which may prohibit you from
associating the Creative Commons' name with modified versions of the
license.
See http://creativecommons.org/policies/
best,
Dana
On 7/16/07, adam hyde <adam AT xs4all.nl> wrote:
hi,
are the wrapper texts under:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
licensed? I ask because I would like to take these templates and change
the wording so it is useful for applying to documentation.
adam
--
adam hyde
'free as in media'
~/.nl
http://www.flossmanuals.net
http://www.simpel.cc
http://www.radioqualia.net
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
-
[cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?,
adam hyde, 07/16/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?,
Dana Powers, 07/16/2007
- Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?, adam hyde, 07/17/2007
-
Re: [cc-licenses] is the cc-gpl text licensed?,
Dana Powers, 07/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.