Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Sunday 06 May 2007 08:56 am, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Kevin Phillips (home) <tacet AT qmpublishing.com> wrote:
> > 7) A corporate barn builder likes your barn so much he makes you
> > give him the blue print - govermint said he can.  He then makes a (c)
> > version of the blue print and sells it, endorsed by a celebrity and
> > sold by a global network of staff, everyone buys his version of your
> > barn.
>
> He can make his own version of the blue print to sell, but your
> original license still applies to the underlying blueprint.  His
> copyright only applies to the expressive work which he has added.

I am not sure that he is allowed to add to the (C) work under the statutory 
license. He is only allowed to cover the (C) work and get a (P) on his 
phonorecording as I understand things. I could easily be wrong and welcome 
learned corrections.
>
> And it's fine if he sells it, endorsed by a celeb, surrounded by
> sycophants or not.  What everyone is buying into is the same barn that
> you wanted them to buy into in the first place.  The corporate barn
> builder is doing exactly what you want him to do.

No, in fact, he is not doing exactly what I would want him to do. I would 
want 
him to release his cover BY-SA. He would be suing the law to force me to do 
something I don't want to do.
>
> -Lucas

all the best,

drew
-- 
(da idea man)