Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Query:Radio

cc-licenses AT

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Mia Garlick <mia AT>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Query:Radio
  • Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:19:27 -0800

hey jonathan,

sorry but i don't quite understand your post. as i mentioned - unless the artist is a member of ASCAP or BMI they legally cannot use a CC license. but an organization can still use a CC licensed work - if it is within the terms of the CC license, then they don't have to do more with it. if their use falls outside of the CC license, then the organization has to enter into individual deals with each artist - is that what you mean when you say that it gets treated as an ARR (I assume you mean "all rights reserved") work?

thanks, mia

On Nov 21, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Jonathon Blake wrote:

Pete wrote:

or if the cc license is non-commercial do they have to approach each individual artist (and previous contributors in the case of a remix/mashup etc) in each individual case to negotiate clearance/ fees etc?

Yes, unless all of the artists are also members of the appropriate
copyright royalty collecting organization--- then it gets treated as
an ARR work.


Ethical conduct is a vice.
Corrupt conduct is a virtue.

Motto of Nacarima
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page