cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts
- From: "Pascal Muller" <pascalmuller AT gmail.com>
- To: "Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts" <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:34:25 +0100
On 11/1/06, Jim Sowers <jim AT spincycle.org> wrote:
Q: Does taking content that has a non-commercial restriction and using on a website that runs AdSense violate the non-comm. restriction? Assume that the primary driver of traffic is the use of CC licensed content?
The language in the license in 4 (c) is: "You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above
in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation."
Seems like this could cover a lot of AdSense-based sites. Just wondering what the current thinking is on this.
If those ads are to pay exclusively for the bandwidth bill, and not to make a profit out of it, I guess it's allowed, because it isn't cial advantage in that case..
--
Pascal Muller
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts,
Jim Sowers, 11/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts,
Pascal Muller, 11/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts,
Mia Garlick, 11/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts, Jim Sowers, 11/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts,
Mia Garlick, 11/01/2006
- [cc-licenses] NC Yet again (was: Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts ), Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts, 11/03/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Version 3.0 - Revised License Drafts,
Pascal Muller, 11/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.