cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 19:58:48 -0400
On Sunday 01 October 2006 10:49 am, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:29:18AM -0400, drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 October 2006 05:47 am, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > I can't think of a license that attempts to do much beyond parallel
> > > distribution that has actually become popular. Remember that free
> >
> > So what is the big ruckus over the GPL3 then?
>
> It's been proposed, it's not actually in use yet and the amount of heat
> it has generated doesn't bode well for wide adoption.
Perhaps, but it does show that some serious Free Software people are
grappling
with the same or similar issues.
all the best,
drew
--
(da idea man)
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/145261
Record a song and you might win $1,000.00
http://www.ourmedia.org/user/17145
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Mark Brown, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Mark Brown, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Mark Brown, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Rob Myers, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Mark Brown, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Greg London, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Evan Prodromou, 10/01/2006
- [cc-licenses] DRM metaphors as a patent, not a binary, Greg London, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Greg London, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Rob Myers, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses, Terry Hancock, 10/02/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Evan Prodromou, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Greg London, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
Mark Brown, 10/01/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses,
drew Roberts, 10/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.