cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
[cc-licenses] [Fwd: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions]
- From: Evan Prodromou <evan AT prodromou.name>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-licenses] [Fwd: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions]
- Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:18:20 +0200
Forwarded message from debian-legal, and a point I'd missed. I can't imagine that there's a reason to have one be "technical measures" and the other be "effective technical measures"... is there?
-Evan
--- Begin Message ---On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 23:05:56 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
- From: Francesco Poli <frx AT firenze.linux.it>
- To: debian-legal AT lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:45:16 +0200
- Resent-date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:46:52 -0500 (CDT)
- Resent-from: debian-legal AT lists.debian.org
> This is the CCv3draft0808060 anti-DRM clause, as quoted by Evan:
>
> | You may not impose any technological measures on the Work that
> | restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to
> | exercise the rights granted to them under the License.
While analyzing the license draft, I noted something strange.
The anti-DRM clause quoted by Evan is, substantially, the one found in
clause 4(a):
| You may not impose any technological measures on the Work that
| restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to
| exercise their rights granted under the License.
There's another one in clause 4(b), which is very similar, but not
equal:
| You may not impose any effective technological measures on the
| Adaptation that restrict the ability of a recipient of the
| Adaptation from You to exercise their rights granted under the
| License.
Please note the adjective "effective"!
Questions:
A) Why are these two clauses different from one another?
B) Is the difference relevant with respect to DFSG compliance?
C) Does specifying that only *effective* technological measures are
forbidden imply that parallel distribution (of DRM-encumbered and
DRM-*un*encumbered copies) is allowed for Adaptations?
--
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment: pgpW4hO6xUDLm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
-
[cc-licenses] [Fwd: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions],
Evan Prodromou, 08/20/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] [Fwd: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- newsand questions], Andres Guadamuz, 08/21/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] [Fwd: Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions], Mia Garlick, 08/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.