Development of Creative Commons licenses

["Douglas Pollard" <Dougpol1 AT adelphia.net>]

I am fairly new to cc and I am making some videos of sailing trips to the 
Caribbean. I would not use anything with so complicated  as what you are 
proposing.  There are just to many things to conceder I would say why bother 
just use a regular copyright if you need to keep so much control. It would 
take a law degree to know if I am infringing on some right.
                                               Doug
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Quoroll" <tjq21 AT cam.ac.uk>
To: "'Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts'" 
<cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Dumping CC-BY-NC-ND and Narrowing CC-BY-ND


> >In the meant time, I find that CC-BY-NC-ND is such an abomination,
> > that I do not feel bound by it.  I shall follow the freedoms.  To me,
> > CC-BY-NC-ND is CC-BY-NC.
>
> Lol fine, you make a derivative of my CC-BY-NC-ND work, I'll sue you, and 
> we'll let the court decide ;)
>
> As I understand it choice lies at the heart of the creative commons 
> concept. Your proposition is interesting but IMHO to limit the choice 
> available to users would surely only push people away from CC licences and 
> towards "all rights reserved", which can only be a bad thing.
>
> Tom.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> [mailto:cc-licenses-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ualabio?
> Sent: 24 April 2006 23:11
> To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org; Cory Doctorow
> Subject: [cc-licenses] Dumping CC-BY-NC-ND and Narrowing CC-BY-ND
>
>
> ¡Hello!
>
> ¿How Fare You?
>
> Awhile ago, I did took an impromptu poll and determined that most
> people hate CC-BY-NC-ND as being antithetical to the purpose as a
> creative commons (one cannot build on them).  We should remove CC-BY-
> NC-ND from future versions of the licenses and reduce the scope of CC-
> BY-ND to commercial works.
>
> We should create all licenses along these lines:
>
> 0. - the freedom to run the work for any purpose (called "freedom
> 0"), at least noncommercially
> 1. - the freedom to study and modify the program ("freedom 1"), at
> least noncommercially
> 2. - the freedom to copy the work so you can help your neighbor
> ("freedom 2"), at least noncommercially
> 3. - the freedom to improve the work, and release your improvements
> to the public, so that the whole community benefits ("freedom 3"), at
> least noncommercially
>
> In the meant time, I find that CC-BY-NC-ND is such an abomination,
> that I do not feel bound by it.  I shall follow the freedoms.  To me,
> CC-BY-NC-ND is CC-BY-NC.  CC-BY-ND does not apply to noncommercial
> works.  I shall write all of the missing chapter I want for CC-BY-NC-
> ND and CC-BY-ND and release them noncommercially.  I shall encourage
> others to do likewise.
>
> CC-BY-NC-ND and CC-BY-ND applied to noncommercial works is
> incompatible with the concept of a creative commons because one
> cannot build on them.
>
> ¡Thanks!
>
> ¡Pax!
>
> ¡Health!
>
> ¡Bye!
>
> —
>
> Ŭalabio‽
>
> --
>
> ― “It is enough that the people know there was an election.  The
> people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the
> votes decide everything.”
> ―
> Joseph Stalin, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the
> Soviet Union
>
> ― “I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to
> the president next year.”
> ―
> Walden Wally “The ElectionFixer” O’Dell, Chairman and CEO of
> Diebold.Com ― Self-service, security, election and service solutions 
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses