cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Ali Baba <mail.alibaba AT free.fr>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:12:48 +0100
And that is the major reason why licences should not contain a clause
allowinderivative material to be distributed under a licence other
than the original one.
So do you mean that a licence like BY-NC is pretty useless if not accompanied by SA? Or that every CC licence, even if not SA, forbids the distribution of derivative material under a different licence than the original one? If the latter, then what exactly does SA adds to a CC licence?
Thanks.
-
[cc-licenses] Triple licence?,
Ali Baba, 03/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?,
Jonathon Blake, 03/13/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?,
Ali Baba, 03/14/2006
- Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?, Jonathon Blake, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?,
Ali Baba, 03/14/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?, Ŭalabio‽, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Triple licence?,
Jonathon Blake, 03/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.