Development of Creative Commons licenses

[drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>]

On Tuesday 13 December 2005 01:14 am, Marcelo Resegue wrote:

>
> Maybe, there could be a even more restrictive CC license for that end.
> Let's call it now CC-kp-sa-nc: Creative Commons keep property, share
> alike, non commercial. That means the original author gives anyone the
> right to use, modify and distribute the work, but he keeps authorship of
> any derivative work; that others may distribute that work and the
> derivative work under the same license only for non-commercial use.
>
I don't think the kp would need the nc to work. I could work the same with 
straight by-sa as well as by-sa-nc. (I don't like the idea, but I do think it 
would work for by-sa as well as by-sa-nc.)

While we are at it, we could go further in the other direction as well.

Instead of kp, we could have fc (free completely) where the original author 
promises to only use the work under the terms of the license and to give no 
other licenses to the work at all.

all the best,

drew
-- 
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22