cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions
- From: drew Roberts <zotz AT 100jamz.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:48:58 -0500
It has been a long time now and we are still waiting for comfortable
clarification of NC.
I think the better approach for the time being is to create, encourage, and
fund BY-SA works so that you can not worry about the answer that is so slow
in arriving.
Two links to get you started:
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/85937
http://www.ourmedia.org/user/17145
Shameless plugs I know.
all the best,
drew
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 08:00 am, Bjorn Wijers wrote:
> Hi Charlie et al,
>
> I don't have an answer, but I find your question very interesting. I
> have had the feeling the definition 'commercial' is just too hard to
> define. Is somebody using Google Ads being commerical? Is a
> not-for-profit per se non-commerical? Is Greenpeace not commercial? I
> think a good definition of commercial is lacking. Until this question.
> Is this idea about the amount of profit a better way of defining
> commercial?
>
> grtz,
> BjornW
>
> spamm thiss wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We'd like to be able to extend the
> > creative commons-attribution-sharealike-noncommercial license to cover
> > noncommercial organizations that have a turnover above a certain
> > amount.
> >
> > This /seems/ to be a trivial extension to the license, but would be
> > extremely useful for our organization (an NGO)
> >
> > How does one go about extending the license? Is it even possible? And
> > are there any (legal) risks associated with doing this?
> >
> > Cheers for any thoughts you can offer
> >
> > Charlie
> >
> > --
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
--
http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22drew%20Roberts%22
-
[cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
spamm thiss, 11/16/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Bjorn Wijers, 11/16/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions, drew Roberts, 11/16/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Ivan Castell, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
drew Roberts, 11/17/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions, Daniel Carrera, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
drew Roberts, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Greg London, 11/16/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions, wiki_tomos, 11/22/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions, wiki_tomos, 11/22/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Stefan Tiedje, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
drew Roberts, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Stefan Tiedje, 11/23/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions, drew Roberts, 11/23/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Stefan Tiedje, 11/23/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
drew Roberts, 11/17/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Granularity on non-commercial restrictions,
Bjorn Wijers, 11/16/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.