cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.
- From: Daniel Carrera <daniel.carrera AT zmsl.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:23:23 +0000
Ivan Castell wrote:
Am I right or this kind of remuneration (Ads) isn't considered as commercial use of this items?
If I posted something under an NC license and you used it to draw people to your site and get money from Ads I would get upset and I would consider it a violation of the license.
Of course, I am not a lawyer. I'll check what the license says later. This is just my gut feeling right now.
Personally I'm not a great fan of the NC licenses. Some times they're OK, but over all I prefer the SA license. The one license I really don't like is ND. And of course, the wrost is NC-ND. I feel that this license misses half the point of a commons.
Personally I use BY-SA for my work and in a few cases BY only.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
DEMAND __ __ __ http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/
| ||__)|__|\ | - Tell Microsoft to support it
|__|| |__| \|DOCUMENT - Sign the petition
-
[cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.,
Ivan Castell, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.,
Daniel Carrera, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.,
Ivan Castell, 11/03/2005
-
[cc-licenses] Use of BY-SA and "the work",
Stephanie Rieger, 11/03/2005
- Re: [cc-licenses] Use of BY-SA and "the work", Daniel Carrera, 11/03/2005
-
[cc-licenses] Use of BY-SA and "the work",
Stephanie Rieger, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.,
Ivan Castell, 11/03/2005
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Use of (BY-NC-ND) pictures on a blog with ads.,
Daniel Carrera, 11/03/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.