Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: CC & other forms of IP -- puzzled

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Johannes Ernst <jernst+lists.ibiblio.org AT netmesh.us>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: CC & other forms of IP -- puzzled
  • Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:20:27 -0800

The only issue I'm raising on this list is:
do or don't the CC licenses currently have any impact on IP rights other than copyright.

The possible answers seem to be:
1) they do not touch any rights that may or may not exist under trademark, patent etc. law
2) they do touch those rights, and this is how
3) the issue is unclear.

If the answer is #3, which is what I suspect, can I raise the issue of "can we do something about this", because it would mean that today, it is impossible for people to use a CC license to publish an article about "we just invented the light bulb". And I don't think that uncertainty is in anyone's interest.

I think the easiest fix would be to answer my question per #1, and clearly state so in the license text.




On Dec 28, 2004, at 7:21, Branko Collin wrote:

On 27 Dec 2004, at 19:23, Johannes Ernst wrote:

Well, take an OSI-approved license that explicitly talks about it:
http://opensource.org/licenses/sunpublic.php, section 2.1: ".. grants
... under Patent Claims ...".

That example seems to explicitely only grant a patent license for the
original code, not for code resulting from any modification:

"no patent license is granted: 1) for code that You delete from the
Original Code; 2) separate from the Original Code; or 3) for
infringements caused by: i) the modification of the Original Code or
ii) the combination of the Original Code with other software or
devices."

For code resulting from modification, only patents by the author of
the modification are licensed, and only for the modified portions of
the code. (Paragraph 2.2.)

Patents on software can be used as a sort of copyright replacement.
An unscrupulous contributor to a FOSS project could contribute code
whilst knowing, but hiding, that he also has a patent on the method
behind the code. Once the project has become popular, he starts
demaning license fees. Patent provisions in FOSS licenses are, AFAIK,
to close this gap. I do not see the broad, viral patent licenses that
you see.

--
branko collin
collin AT xs4all.nl
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page