Development of Creative Commons licenses

["Greg London" <email AT greglondon.com>]

GNU-FDL is copyleft.
If you aggregate, you can treat it as a separate license.
If you derive, you will have to license the derivative GNU-FDL.

dskarjune AT dunwoody.edu said:
> I'm a college instructor at a nonprofit institution.  For a new course, I
> would like to publish a small booklet in-house at the college for 
> distribution
> to students for a small distribution fee.  I would like to combine some
> material with a CC  Attribution-NonCommercial 1.0 license and some material
> under the GNU FDL with some original material of my own.  I would like to
> publish the new aggregate primarily under a CC Attribution-NonCommercial 
> 1.0.
>
>
>
> Do I have a correct understanding of "noncommercial"?
>
> Is it possible to include both licenses to cover the reused invariant
> selections from a GNU FDL source?
>
> Is there an inherent conflict in the aggregate approach I've described?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> David Hedrick Skarjune
>
> Dunwoody College of Technology
>
> Minneapolis, MN
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>


-- 
Hungry for a good read? Crave science fiction?
Get a taste of "Hunger Pangs" by Greg London.
http://www.greglondon.com/hunger/