cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: In Favor of CC-FA
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:01:10 +0100
In an ideal world, all software would be GPL and all content would be CC-SA . But "weaker" licenses can be a useful stepping stone as well as addressing other contemporary social concerns.
To support this argument (that soft licenses encourage people to try hard licenses :-) ), I'd cite this page: http://craphound.com/down/
"I chose the most restrictive CC license available to me, staying cautious, and I waited to see if the sky would fall.
...
It didn't.
...
So here we are, just a little over a year later
...
I am re-licensing Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, effective today, under the terms of one of the least restrictive Creative Commons licenses, the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license..."
If it was a choice of all or nothing rather than trying a little, finding it works and then going all the way, would this work now be in the commons?
- Rob.
-
In Favor of CC-FA,
Rob Myers, 03/28/2004
- Re: In Favor of CC-FA, Greg London, 03/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.