cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller <sloyment AT gmx.net>
- To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: No warranty!
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:19:02 +0100
Hi!
Let us please look at the following situation:
* First, I create a work and release it under a free license.
* Then someone falsely claims authorship to that work.
Without a warranty given, that asshole can now start suing me and
the people who distribute the work. This would be a real
problem, but there is no real protection against it, anyway.
However, if I give a warranty, billions of people can start suing
me in this situation.
- - - - -
Another scenario:
* First, I receive a work under the CC-SA.
* Next, I modify it and publish the modified work.
* Later, it turns out that the first work was illegal.
The problem here is that when I publish the modified work, I have
to warrant that my version is legal. However, there is no safe
way for me to determine wether the upstream version was legal.
With a bit odf bad luck, billions of people might choose to sue
me and not the upstream author.
- - - - -
It seems to me that licenses that demand a warranty are a can of
worms, and I won't use them.
cu,
Thomas }:o{#
-- - http://217.160.174.154/~sloyment/ - --
"Look! They have different music on the dance floor..."
-
No warranty!,
Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller, 02/02/2004
-
Re: No warranty!,
Evan Prodromou, 02/02/2004
- Re: No warranty!, Evan Prodromou, 02/02/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: No warranty!,
Rob Myers, 02/02/2004
- Re: No warranty!, Evan Prodromou, 02/02/2004
- Re: No warranty!, Rob Myers, 02/02/2004
-
Re: No warranty!,
Evan Prodromou, 02/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.