cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
- From: Ben Judson <ben AT eatworms.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: attribution
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 15:15:30 -0500
Title: attribution
I'm new to this list, and have only briefly skimmed the archives,
so I apologize if I'm rehashing old stuff here....
Attribution is a big issue here, and finding an elegant way to
deal with it is going to be essential for many would-be Creative
Commons/Open Content authors. I notice that the Open Publication
License (OPL) deals with this in a more direct manner than the
Creative Commons licenses. The OPL
(http://opencontent.org/openpub/) lays out the following
requirements:
1. The modified version must be labeled as
such.
2. The person making the modifications must
be identified and the modifications dated.
3. Acknowledgement of the original author
and publisher if applicable must be retained according to normal
academic citation practices.
4. The location of the original unmodified
document must be identified.
5. The original author's (or authors')
name(s) may not be used to assert or imply endorsement of the
resulting document without the original author's (or authors')
permission.
This (esp. requirement 2) is pretty
extensive compared to the CC licenses. So my question is: is
there an elegant way to provide this kind of information regarding the
'version history' of a work? If the work is to be kept in the
digital realm, some slight modification of the 'wiki' system would do
the job nicely (allowing and tracking modifications by, potentially,
anyone). Some word processors also collect and save data about
modifications. The OPL provides for restricting the work to a
specific medium -- you can designate that a work remain only in print
form, for instance, or restrict others from putting it in print form
(thus you could keep it in a system which 'guarantees' the
authenticity of the credited authors).
But in print form this kind of rigorous
attribution system seems doomed to be awkward. With the advent
of DRM, PDF, Wiki, etc. etc. the concept of limiting the media on
which a work may appear seems to be closely intertwined with the
concept of attribution.
I love what you're doing at Creative
Commons. The project is much more extensive and ambitious than
anything of its type that I've seen so far.
Thanks,
Ben.
--
eatworms.org ++ burn the lines of the city ++
eatworms.org ++ burn the lines of the city ++
- attribution, Ben Judson, 05/31/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.