cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT gondwanaland.com>
- To: Maarten Zeinstra <mz AT kl.nl>
- Cc: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:20:35 -0700
On 03/12/2015 08:31 AM, Maarten Zeinstra wrote:
> So you would actually advise not using the CC:License term in this case?
Assuming this case is something like deciding the range of edm:rights
then yes I would advise using dcterms:RightsStatement rather than
cc:License. Your schema would be more accurate if less precise. It would
unquestionably allow objects that aren't licenses but instead are public
domain or other copyright status determinations, even objects which
themselves have a license property, much like the ODRS example you
linked to.
Mike
-
[cc-devel] ccREL question,
Maarten Zeinstra, 03/09/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/11/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Maarten Zeinstra, 03/12/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/12/2015
- Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question, Maarten Zeinstra, 03/16/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/12/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Maarten Zeinstra, 03/12/2015
-
Re: [cc-devel] ccREL question,
Mike Linksvayer, 03/11/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.