cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: "Mr. Puneet Kishor" <punkish AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Dan Mills <dan AT creativecommons.org>
- Cc: "cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org" <cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:23:22 -0400
Did we consider Gitorious given that its source code is available and, as
such, it is at least philosophically more aligned with CC's normative goals
than Github may be? I do want to underscore that I have no reason to doubt
Github's creds for citizenship in the open community other than the fact that
Github's source code itself is not open source.
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Dan Mills <dan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just wanted to give you all a heads up that I'm moving all of our
> sources to GitHub:
>
> https://github.com/creativecommons/
>
> So far I've migrated all of the git repositories, svn ones are quite a
> bit harder to migrate (and preserve history), but hopefully those will
> be up there within the week as well.
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> cc-devel mailing list
> cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
-
[cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Dan Mills, 10/24/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Mr. Puneet Kishor, 10/24/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Dan Mills, 10/24/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Dan Mills, 10/28/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Maarten Zeinstra, 10/28/2013
- Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration, Dan Mills, 10/29/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Maarten Zeinstra, 10/28/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Dan Mills, 10/28/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Dan Mills, 10/24/2013
-
Re: [cc-devel] GitHub migration,
Mr. Puneet Kishor, 10/24/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.