cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: Wendy Bossons <wbossons AT MIT.EDU>
- To: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [cc-devel] More on Re: CC 1.5 and embedding RDF
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:21:49 -0500
Forgive my newbie-ness, but I have one further question that's related to my original "which rdf block in the response is used for what purpose" question. The application I'm working on, dspace, allows the administrator to view a transformed/serialized version of the rdf, which I believe represents the license in ccREL. I am unfamiliar with pre-1.5 versions of the API, and understand that this application used the integration approach with Creative Commons. If I enter a license url such as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/rdf, it returns the transformed version of the rdf to which I referred above. Was that same pattern followed for version 2 licenses? (e.g. http://creativecommons.org . . ./2.0/.../rdf) The versions of the transformed rdf for both the version 2 and version 3 licenses (in dspace) look very similar. If that's the case, my application may no longer need to be transforming the rdf as it was prior to my work. ..\Wendy On Nov 30, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Wendy Bossons wrote:
|
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-
[cc-devel] More on Re: CC 1.5 and embedding RDF,
Wendy Bossons, 12/01/2009
- Re: [cc-devel] More on Re: CC 1.5 and embedding RDF, Nathan Yergler, 12/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.