cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: "Nathan R. Yergler" <nathan AT creativecommons.org>
- To: "Hubert Figuiere" <hub AT figuiere.net>
- Cc: CC Developer Mailing List <cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 08:29:21 -0700
On 7/6/07, Hubert Figuiere <hub AT figuiere.net> wrote:
Jason Kivlighn wrote:
>> Why .filename.xmp ? It should be basename.xmp (no dot prepended)
>> I don't know where this convention comes from but definitely not the one
>> from the current (non-free) implementations.
>> I'd rather wish we don't reinvent the wheel.
> Just to be clear, this means that for, say, file.jpg, the xmp sidecar
> would be at file.xmp (and not file.jpg.xmp)?
Yes. That's what it is.
Is this a standard from the non-free implementations? It seems like
this can only lead to more likely collisions in sidecar files (ie,
what if I have "july4.jpg" and "july4.mpg" in the same folder?).
Hub
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Jason Kivlighn, 07/05/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 07/06/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Nathan R. Yergler, 07/06/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 07/08/2007
- Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch, Jon Phillips, 07/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 07/08/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Nathan R. Yergler, 07/06/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 07/06/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.