cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: Jason Kivlighn <jkivlighn AT gmail.com>
- To: Hubert Figuiere <hub AT figuiere.net>
- Cc: CC Developer Mailing List <cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org>, tracker-list AT gnome.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:52:59 -0700
> Why .filename.xmp ? It should be basename.xmp (no dot prepended)
> I don't know where this convention comes from but definitely not the one
> from the current (non-free) implementations.
> I'd rather wish we don't reinvent the wheel.
>
Jamie will have to respond on this one. It'd be convenient to have the
xmp hidden (Tracker wouldn't index it twice), but following the current
convention, which I wasn't aware of, would be best.
>> How does the patch look? Style? Approach? etc... Also, how do I go
>> about getting commit access?
>>
>
> xmp_init() cost a lot to call. Same as xmp_terminate(). You should only
> call then once. Actually xmp_terminate() isn't mandatory as when the
> programm quits, things will be cleaned up.
>
I'm not sure what can be done about this one. For each file that is
indexed, a separate process is spawned.
> And the CC namespace of XMP is defined in the library. It is NS_CC. This
> is cosmetic, but ensure that we use the right string.
>
Ah, I'll make sure to use that.
-Jason
-
[cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Jason Kivlighn, 06/07/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 06/07/2007
- Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch, Jason Kivlighn, 06/10/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] XMP/CC in Tracker, first patch,
Hubert Figuiere, 06/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.