cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools
List archive
- From: "Luke Hoersten" <luke.hoersten AT gmail.com>
- To: "CC Developer Mailing List" <cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:44:33 -0500
I've stopped using FF 2 completely because its so slow on Linux. I
have the same problems you are describing, Luis, but with all plugins
and FF, not just mozcc. Perhaps this problem is with FF's plugin
interface.
-Luke
On 1/22/07, Luis Villa <luis AT tieguy.org> wrote:
On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <nathan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
> I admittedly didn't do much testing without MozCC installed v. with it
> installed, but rather between the old and new version. So I'll take a
> look as well and see if its something I might have missed.
FWIW, I've been using mozcc religiously (given the conflict, I
disabled operator, not mozcc ;) so my first comparison was between old
and new mozcc.
Luis
> Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <nathan AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
> >> An updated version of MozCC is now available for testing. Version 2.3.9
> >> is a recommended update as it resolves a number of outstanding issues
> >> including:
> >>
> >> * Rewrite of the RDFa extraction engine which no longer pollutes
> >> Javascript prototypes
> >> * Performance enhancements when extracting RDFa from documents
> >> * Interoperability fixes with other extensions
> >
> > For what it is worth, Nathan, this fixes the interoperability problems
> > I had with Operator[1] but the new plugin seems to completely degrade
> > ffox performance on most of the pages I used- took several times
> > longer to load my blog and mail.google.com. This happens with or
> > without Operator installed, so it isn't the result of an interaction
> > with Operator.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing this? I don't have time (class shortly) to
> > uninstall/disable *all* of my plugins, but I'm guessing if Nathan
> > didn't see it it must be an interaction with some other plugin, so
> > I'll have to back everything out later tonight if no one else is
> > seeing it.
> >
> > Luis
> >
> > [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4106/
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-devel mailing list
> > cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
>
>
> --
> Nathan R. Yergler
> Senior Software Engineer
> Creative Commons
>
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
>
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
--
Luke Hoersten
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/~lhoerste/
http://www.openradix.org/
-
[cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luke Hoersten, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
- Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing, Nathan R. Yergler, 01/23/2007
- Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing, Luis Villa, 01/23/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luke Hoersten, 01/22/2007
- Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing, Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Nathan R. Yergler, 01/22/2007
-
Re: [cc-devel] MozCC 2.3.9 Available for Testing,
Luis Villa, 01/22/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.