Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-devel - Re: [cc-devel] Exif metadata

cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Developer discussion for Creative Commons technology and tools

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Luis Villa" <luis.villa AT gmail.com>
  • To: "Mike Linksvayer" <ml AT creativecommons.org>
  • Cc: cc-devel AT lists.ibiblio.org, discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work <cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-devel] Exif metadata
  • Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:42:08 -0400

On 8/18/06, Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org> wrote:
A web notice gives one the level of assurance that one normally gets
from the web ... as opposed to zero.

Ah! yes. We raise it from zero to... practically zero :) Seriously,
this buys no protection against any serious/meaningful attempts at
fraud, while making it incredibly onerous for the vast, vast majority
of the population that can't guarantee a permanent web presence.

> That seems incredibly onerous.

It may be, but if I may repeat myself, embedding a reference to a
license itself is incredibly worthless.

You're demanding a higher level of accountability with this than with
any other licensing system I've ever seen. When I publish my code
under GPL, I don't include a link in the source saying 'this is a link
to a webpage 'proving' that the code is under GPL', I just do it.
People publish books under CC all the time which just say 'the license
is foo', even though PDFs, HTML, and text are all editable- just like
the exif fields. I'm really not clear why EXIFs, as opposed to any
other editable content format ever, deserve this special publisher
burden.

Luis




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page