bluesky AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Global-Scale Distributed Storage Systems
List archive
- From: hal AT finney.org
- To: bluesky AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: the three-services model
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 16:58:25 -0800
Wei writes:
> The three services model doesn't preclude additional services like
> keyword-based searching, but clearly for a general purpose storage system,
> persistent and secure naming is a key requirement.
But perhaps a *friendly* name is not a requirement. Freenet has
considered a scheme where files would be described by metadata.
The metadata for a file would be a short list of attribute-value pairs
for things like title, author, publication date, keywords, etc. You would
search using these fields, and then get back a content hash.
MojoNation works much the same way. You search on metadata and get back
a content hash like the one I showed earlier.
These systems suggest that item (1) in the three service model may be
modified by having metadata in place of a friendly name.
You could also imagine systems which allow direct searches of the text
of documents (similar to what we have on the web with search engines)
and return a content hash key. These would have neither friendly names
nor metadata.
Hal
-
the three-services model,
Wei Dai, 02/16/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: the three-services model, hal, 02/17/2001
- Re: the three-services model, Wei Dai, 02/17/2001
- Re: the three-services model, hal, 02/18/2001
- Re: the three-services model, hal, 02/18/2001
- Re: the three-services model, hal, 02/19/2001
- Re: the three-services model, Wei Dai, 02/19/2001
- Re: the three-services model, Ted Anderson, 02/26/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.