b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: Jonathan Mohler <jonathan.mohler AT gmail.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:53:58 -0400
What I have said is that I tend to think that corresponding to את, אתה, אתם AT, ATAH, ATEM, there was in use, in some corner of Hebrew אך, אכה, אכם AK, AKAH, AKEM (a hint of which we find in אנוכי ANOKIY and אנחנו ANAXNU), that survived only as a "suffix" personal pronoun (PP) to express the "genitive", to wit, אמך IMKA = EM-AKAH, 'your mother'. Another fossil is the אתי ATIY, instead of אני ANIY, left frozen as a "suffix" in the compound שברתי $ABARTIY = $ABAR-ATIY, 'I have broken'. Isaac Fried, Boston University On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Jonathan Mohler wrote: I don't have a theory for how the self-standing ATAH would engender the suffix -KAH. |
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why tsere? (was ואילילה Micah 1:8),
Jonathan Mohler, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why tsere? (was ואילילה Micah 1:8),
Isaac Fried, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why tsere? (was ואילילה Micah 1:8) Development of 2mp pronominal suffix,
Jonathan Mohler, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix,
Isaac Fried, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix,
Jonathan Mohler, 07/25/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix, Isaac Fried, 07/25/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix,
Jonathan Mohler, 07/25/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] genitive PP suffix,
Isaac Fried, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why tsere? (was ואילילה Micah 1:8) Development of 2mp pronominal suffix,
Jonathan Mohler, 07/24/2013
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Why tsere? (was ואילילה Micah 1:8),
Isaac Fried, 07/24/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.