b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: jimstinehart AT aol.com
- To: chavoux AT gmail.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] XRB: "Mt. Horeb" vs. "desert"
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:02:49 -0500 (EST)
Chavoux Luyt:
You wrote: “That
option [that the place where Moses saw the burning bush and where he is to “serve
God” is not in or near the Sinai or Arabia] is simply not possible because
Exodus 3:12 makes it explicit that the Israelites will serve God on that very
mountain where He first appeared to Moses. Whether that mountain is actually the place
called Mt.Sinai today, is another question that should probably be asked in an
archaeological group rather than b-hebrew.”
The key issue here is not archaeology, but rather is the
meaning of the Hebrew common word (BD, in the _expression_ “serve God” or “serve
Me”. That’s a classic question for the
b-hebrew list to discuss.
In fact, the Exodus 3: 12
concept of “serving God” on “this mountain” requires a locale where the Hebrews
are divinely fated to live, not a desolate locale far south of where the
Israelites settle. An express reference
to “serv[ing] God”, where “serve” is some form of the Hebrew verb (BD, appears
on 15 occasions in Exodus. On all but
the first and third occasions, the phrase certainly embodies the concept of
serving YHWH for a long time, even forever, rather than signifying an act of
short duration. Exodus 4: 23; 8: 1, 20;
9: 1, 13; 10: 3, 7-8, 11, 26(2); 12: 31; 23: 25. Under ordinary circumstances, that would seem
to be the only natural reading of this phrase “serve God” [or “serve Me”] that
is used so many times in Exodus. However,
the third such reference, at Exodus 7: 16, is ambiguous in this regard, because
although YHWH is intending that the Israelites should serve Him forever, he
there refers to the Israelites serving God in the wilderness [midbar], which at
least in some sense would imply only a limited period of time [while the
Israelites were in the wilderness during the Exodus].
The key question then is
this: what concept is implied in the
first such reference to the phrase “serv[ing] God”, at Exodus 3: 12? Certainly the meaning that applies at least 13
out of the other 14 times such phrase occurs in Exodus should be favored. When Moses is fairly near [but not in] MDYN,
and YHWH tells Moses “ye shall serve God upon this mountain”, the phrase “serve
God upon this mountain” should be given its natural meaning of serving God
forever at that locale. Accordingly, the
mountain in question needs to be located within the land that the Israelites
are divinely fated to inhabit [and hence nowhere near the Sinai or Arabia,
contra the traditional and scholarly view of the geography here]. So once the Israelites have taken all of the
land which they have been divinely granted, they will be able to continually
“serve God” forever in this location [upon “this mountain”]. That is my interpretation. It strains the Hebrew word (BD to take the
radically different interpretation that “serv[ing] God upon this mountain”
merely implies that the Israelites are to listen to God’s word at Mt. Sinai
[with Mt. Sinai being “this mountain” on that interpretation], when they are in
the wilderness during the Exodus. After
the Exodus from Egypt has been completed, the Israelites will have no further
occasion to go south to the southern Sinai to serve God at that desolate
location, which is situated very far south of the land that the Israelites are
divinely fated to inhabit as their own land. Of course, the Israelites must always keep the
10 Commandments that Moses receives at Mt. Sinai, that’s for sure. But the Israelites will not be at Mt. Sinai to
“serve God” after the Exodus has been completed, as the more natural reading of
Exodus 3: 12 requires.
The interpretation of
“serv[ing] God” at Exodus 3: 12 which requires serving God on an ongoing,
permanent basis is the only natural reading of this phrase, as backed up by at
least 13 of the other 14 uses of this same phrase in Exodus. On that natural reading, the “desert”/XRB
mountain where Moses encounters the burning bush must be located within the
boundaries of the land that the Israelites are divinely fated to possess and
inhabit, so that “upon this mountain” the Israelites will be able to serve YHWH
forever. And t-h-a-t is why Moses insists on attacking King Og at Numbers 21: 33 and taking his land of Bashan in the northern Transjordan, even though Bashan was not on the route of the Conquest and was not part of the Promised Land of Canaan [west of the Jordan River]: so that "this mountain", the "desert"/XRB mountain where Moses sees the burning bush at Exodus 3: 2-4, will be part of the land where the Israelites settle. The XRB/"desert" mountain site of the burning bush is located just south of Zipporah's homeland of MDYN [historical Mitanni in eastern Syria],being just north of the eastern Transjordan, at the far northeast corner of where the Israelites settled and "serve[d] God" forever.
Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois
-
Re: [b-hebrew] XRB: "Mt. Horeb" vs. "desert",
Chavoux Luyt, 01/17/2013
- Re: [b-hebrew] XRB: "Mt. Horeb" vs. "desert", jimstinehart, 01/17/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.