b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Rev. Bryant J. Williams III" <bjwvmw AT com-pair.net>
- To: "George Athas" <George.Athas AT moore.edu.au>, "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas)
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:24:01 -0700
Dear George,
Let's look at the entire
chapter.
9:1-2,
Timetable of Scriptural Search.
Darius, Son of Xerxes (a Median), 1st yr of reign.
70 yrs Exile, Jer. 25:11-12; 29:10.
9:3-19, Prayer of
Confession and Contrition for the Sins of the nation of Israel (see verses 7,
11) and Jerusalem (see verses 7, 16 (2x)).
9:20-23,
Visitation of Gabriel.
9:24-27, The
Interpretation Given to Daniel.
9:24, The Decree 70 Weeks of Sevens for the People (Israel and
Judah) and Jerusalem.
To Finish the Transgression,
To Put an End to Sin,
To Atone for Wickedness,
To Bring in Everlasting Righteousness,
To Seal Up Vision and Prophecy,
To Anoint the Most Holy (One, or Place).
(NOTE:
Notice the parallelism in the 24b and 24c with the
infinitives).
9:25, The Command/Decree to Restore and Rebuild Jerusalem until
the Anointed One.
7 Sevens (49 years),
62 Sevens (434 years),
Rebuilt with Streets and Trench (Gutters).
9:26, Cutting Off of Anointed One (Messiah),
After the 62 Sevens (after the total of 69 weeks),
Destruction
of the City AND Sanctuary by the People of the Ruler Who Will Come.
The End will come like a Flood.
War will continue to the End,
Desolations have been decreed.
9:27, The Ruler (vs. 26) Will Confirm A
Covenant
For 1 Week (7 years)
With Many
The Ruler (vs. 26) in the Middle of the Week (3.5 years; 42 months)
Will Put an End to Sacrifice and Offerings Cease
Will Cause to Place An "Abomination" in the Temple
The End is Decreed for Him (the Ruler) is consummated.
There are distinctions made
between the Anointed One and the Ruler in verses 25-27. First, the Anointed One,
Messiah, is put to death (cut-off) after the 7 Weeks of Seven from vers 25 and
the 62 Weeks of Seven. Second, the Ruler is clearly different from the Anointed
One, Messiah, as he is one who will destroy the City AND the Sanctuary; he will
make a covenant with many, then break that covenant after 1/2 of a Week of
Seven, 3.5 years (42 months); and place an Abomination in the Temple until he is
put to an end. There is also the constant refrain to "The End." It is
mentioned 3 times between 24-27.
Regarding the "Abomination of
Desolation." We do know from I Maccabees that Antiochus Epiphanes did place an
"Abomination" in the Temple, but he did not destroy the city. Secondly, Titus in
70 AD did destroy the city and sanctuary, but did not make a covenant with many.
Regarding the issue of verse 25 and
the decree to restore and rebuild Jersusalem. First, the decree to return was
issued in 539 BC by Cyrus, II Chron. 36: 22-23, Ezra 1:1-4, and carried out by
Zerubbabel in 536-535 BC, thus the end of the physical 70 years of Exile as
decreed by the LORD in Jeremiah 25:11-12 and 29:10. Second, the Temple
foundation was laid, but the Temple was NOT completed until 516 BC, thus the end
of the spiritual exile. Third, Ezra led second return in 457 BC. Fourth,
Nehemiah led a third return in 445-44 BC.
What has not been mentioned
is dating of the 69 Weeks of Seven (483 years). Non-dispensationalists will
have varying opinions. Dispensationalists will follow the Decree given by
Artaxerxes 1, for whom Nehemiah was a cupbearer, in 445 BC. What is not
mentioned is that the years mentioned as part of the 70 Weeks of Sevens are
"lunar" years not "solar" as far as we know. This will also affect the
timing of the death of the Anointed One, Messiah at the end of the 69th Week of
Sevens. Thus, this will place the death of Messiah sometime between 27-33 AD.
Most will place this around 33 AD; although earlier is certainly possible.
Finally, the 70th Week of Sevens is clearly set apart from the rest of the 69
Weeks of Seven.
Finally, the dating and authorship
of the Book of Daniel will definitely affect the interpretation of this passage
since one will determine if it was written by Daniel or not. In other words
primarily between Daniel ca. 535 BC or by some one else around 165
BC.
It should be pointed out that at
this point we are dealing with systems of hermeneutics. I WILL NOT DISCUSS THAT
HERE unless privately, because of list guidelines.
En Xristwi,
Rev. Bryant J. Williams
III
|
-
[b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
K Randolph, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
K Randolph, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/24/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III, 10/24/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas), George Athas, 10/25/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
K Randolph, 10/24/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas), Jack Kilmon, 10/24/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas), K Randolph, 10/25/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas), George Athas, 10/25/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
Rev. Bryant J. Williams III, 10/24/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/24/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
K Randolph, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
K Randolph, 10/23/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
George Athas, 10/23/2012
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas),
Rolf, 10/24/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:21?27 (George Athas), George Athas, 10/25/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.