b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:42:51 -0400
NI-$MAR (2Sam 20:10) is 'was on his guard', but NI-QBAR (Ruth 1:17) is 'was buried'. As an adjective, NI-$KAX (Is. 23:16) is
'forgotten'. As a noun, NI-DBAK (Ezra 6:4) is a NI-DBAQ, 'a fitted course building blocks'.
Today we have סכין נשלפת SAKIYN NI-$LEP-ET, 'removable blade'.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Pere Porta wrote:
is it right to state that in a
general way there is NO difference between the Qal passive Participle and
the Niph'al Participle concerning their meanings?
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Pere Porta, 07/04/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?, Isaac Fried, 07/04/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
K Randolph, 07/05/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Pere Porta, 07/05/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Isaac Fried, 07/05/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
David Kolinsky, 07/05/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Pere Porta, 07/06/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?, Isaac Fried, 07/06/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Pere Porta, 07/06/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
David Kolinsky, 07/05/2012
- Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?, K Randolph, 07/09/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Isaac Fried, 07/05/2012
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?,
Pere Porta, 07/05/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.