Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • To: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: B-Hebrew list <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Different binyan, same meaning?
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:42:51 -0400

NI-$MAR (2Sam 20:10) is 'was on his guard', but NI-QBAR (Ruth 1:17) is 'was buried'. As an adjective, NI-$KAX (Is. 23:16) is
'forgotten'. As a noun, NI-DBAK (Ezra 6:4) is a NI-DBAQ, 'a fitted course building blocks'.

Today we have סכין נשלפת SAKIYN NI-$LEP-ET, 'removable blade'.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Pere Porta wrote:

is it right to state that in a
general way there is NO difference between the Qal passive Participle and
the Niph'al Participle concerning their meanings?





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page