Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] (MQ: "Deep Place"

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: JimStinehart AT aol.com
  • To: chavoux AT gmail.com, b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] (MQ: "Deep Place"
  • Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:51:15 -0500 (EST)


Chavoux Luyt:

1. You wrote [near the end of your post]: “Hebron is mentioned in
Egyptian inscriptions from the Late Bronze Age (i.e. long before David) and
in the
same region as the later Hebron.”

That’s where you’re wrong. The five letters XBRWN are never attested as a
geographical place name prior to post-exilic times.

XBR, usually transliterated as Khibur, is attested in the 13th and 12th
centuries BCE as a place in the Beqa Valley in eastern Lebanon. To the best
of
my knowledge, no mainstream, respectable scholar accepts the non-scholarly
claim that Khibur/XBR on those Rameside lists may possibly be XBRWN/Hebron
in southern hill country.

2. You wrote: “Because there is no other indication that there ever were
two separate cities with the same name.”

That’s not true. Here are some of the things that Genesis says about the
Patriarchs’ XBRWN, none of which could fit King David’s XBRWN high up in
southern hill country.

(a) The Patriarchs’ XBRWN is the opposite of “east” of Bethel. Genesis
13: 9, 11.

(b) The Patriarchs’ XBRWN is “a deep place”: (MQ at Genesis 37: 14. (MQ
is often applied to broad, true valleys in the Shephelah, but in the Bible
(MQ is never applied to a high altitude mountain valley.

(c) The Patriarchs’ XBRWN was ruled by an Amorite princeling who was
allied with tent-dwellers and various princelings [Anir and Eshcol]. Genesis
14:
13. That perfectly fits Milk-Ilu in the Amarna Letters, who historically
dominated the Ayalon Valley and allied with habiru/tent-dwellers and various
princelings. Nothing of that type is attested historically in southern hill
country. Moreover, note that the XBR root of XBRWN, and the Hebrew version
of Milk-Ilu, namely MLK-Y-)L, appear side by side at Genesis 46: 17 in the
list of Jacob’s descendants. The text thereby subtly lets us know that the
location of the Patriarchs’ XBRWN, whose root is XBR, was where the dominant
princeling in the Patriarchal Age/Amarna Age had the Amorite version of the
name MLK-Y-)L, namely Milk-Ilu: the Ayalon Valley!

3. You wrote: “Moreover, it is clearly stated that the place only got the
name "Hebron" later, after the settlement of Israel in Canaan.”

That’s not stated in the Patriarchal narratives!

At least in the Bronze Age, and likely in the Iron Age as well, most
valleys in Canaan did not have formal names. Each city and small town had a
formal name, but not the valleys. Biblical authors were therefore forced by
necessity to come up with a Biblical nickname for (i) the deep valley where
the
Patriarchs sojourned well west of Bethel, and (ii) the high altitude
mountain valley where King David made his first great conquests. Based on
the
various meanings of XBRWN [not discussed in this post], the perfect nickname
for
both places was XBRWN.

4. You wrote: “The ")MQ" of Hebron can be any of the valleys around the
city [in southern hill country].”

That simply is not true. (MQ is used in the Bible only to describe “a deep
place” that is either (i) itself a broad, true valley, like the Ayalon
Valley in the Shephelah, or (ii) a valley that is connected to a broad, true
valley, like the Rephaim Valley southwest of Jerusalem that connects with the
Elah Valley in the Shephelah.
(MQ is never used in the Bible to describe a high altitude mountain valley
that is neither itself a broad true valley nor connected to a broad true
valley. King David’s Hebron is the highest altitude place in Canaan where
people lived, and as such it is antithetical to being described in Biblical
Hebrew as “a deep place”: (MQ. Rather, the Bible repeatedly, and not
surprisingly, uses the words (LH and HR in describing King David’s Hebron,
way “up”
/(LH in the “mountains”/HR, while never ever using either of those two
words to describe the Patriarchs’ Hebron. Why? Because those two Hebrons
have
completely different locales: one is the low-lying Ayalon Valley west of
Bethel in the Shephelah, and the other is an incredibly high place on the
southern end of the Ridge Route. The former is (MQ, whereas the latter is
rightly characterized by (LH and HR, with such concepts being antithetical in
the
Bible.

If the last 40 chapters of Genesis were talking about the highest altitude
place in Canaan where people can live [King David’s Hebron], where towering
mountains dominate the scene, there’s no way that the word HR would never be
used even once to describe such place. Not! The Patriarchal narratives
use the word HR 15 times, but not once in connection with the Patriarchs’
XBRWN. That’s because the Patriarchs’ XBRWN was the low-lying (MQ of the
Ayalon Valley.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page