b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

[b-hebrew] xiriq-cere

From: "Nir cohen - Prof. Mat." <nir AT ccet.ufrn.br>
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] xiriq-cere
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:44:07 -0200

pere,

if you do not allow the YOD, and not guttural second letter, and not dagesh,
i suspect the word would contradict the rules of niqud.

best
nir cohen

PS non-guttural piel in modern hebrew:

rikhel (from RKhYL=gossip) is used in modern hebrew. it is written RIYKh"L but
is most probably not BH. maybe HOLEKH RAKhIYL is BH.

pizem (from pizmon = tune), clearly non-BH. i am not sure if it has a dagesh.

>>> De: Pere Porta <pporta7 AT gmail.com>
Para: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Data: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:40:39 +0200
Assunto: Re: [b-hebrew] Again on hireq/sere
My question is: ...Are there in Hebrew nouns, adjectives,
adverbs... having ONLY a hireq in their first syllable and a sere in their
second syllable (no dagesh, no shewa, no patah furtivum... at all!)?

[b-hebrew] xiriq-cere, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat., 04/21/2011