b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
- To: "fred burlingame" <tensorpath AT gmail.com>
- Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:48:32 -0500
In my Humble opinion the single-consonant Hebrew root L signifies
loftiness, elevation (or elongation). Every Hebrew root containing L
contains reference to this basic concept.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
> The two little letters )L combined in this manner, enjoy a wide
> horizontal & vertical range of meaning, depending on context; presence
or absence of vowels; plural or singular; differing shades
pronunciation; etc. Witness strong's numbers 352, 408, 410, 411, 413,
414, 421, 422, 423, 424, 428, 430, 433. Does not this word flexibility
imply the two halves of the language; the one literal; the other
figurative?
> regards,
>
> fred burlingame
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
-
[b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
fred burlingame, 12/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
fred burlingame, 12/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
Isaac Fried, 12/19/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal, fred burlingame, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
Isaac Fried, 12/19/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
fred burlingame, 12/18/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] figurative vs. literal,
Isaac Fried, 12/18/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.