b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX.

From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
To: Yitzhak Sapir <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
Cc: B-Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX.
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:02:25 -0400

As far as I can see it there is no shred of evidence to your assertions.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Yitzhak Sapir wrote:

Normally, the schewa was pronounced as hataf-patah.

[b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., Garth Grenache, 06/30/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., James Christian, 06/30/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., Yitzhak Sapir, 06/30/2010
  - Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., Isaac Fried, 06/30/2010
  - Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., James Christian, 06/30/2010
    - Re: [b-hebrew] 'Vocal shwa' had no true/phonemic quality at the time of LXX., Yitzhak Sapir, 06/30/2010