Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] re.: Inseparable Prepositions and that shewa

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Vadim Cherny <vadimcherny AT gmail.com>
  • To: robert.ryan AT xtra.co.nz
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] re.: Inseparable Prepositions and that shewa
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:40:42 +0300

The question is largely moot. Though the MT differentiates between shwa, patah, and segol, this not a case with Babylonian notation. Thus, in terms of quantity and quality vocal shwa is not drastically different from segol or, for that matter, any ultra-short vowel.

Syllabification really depends on the diction. You would have different syllabification in speech and singing, in stand-alone words and emphatic clauses.

Dagesh kal need not follow any closed syllable: citvei, dvarchem.

Look at it the other way around: dagesh kal is used for, and only for syllabification. Like their many other chanting marks, dagesh kal was meant by the Masoretes for chanting: it forcibly syllabifies the words.

Vadim Cherny


---

Your opinions please.

My grammars are divided into two schools of thought concerning the way an inseparable preposition attaches itself to a word that begins with a vocal shewa.

The first school of thought says that under these conditions, an inseparable preposition creates a closed syllable at the beginning of a word, usually invoking the "rule of shewa." However, this approach ignores the absence of a dagesh lene in any following begadkephat letter.

The second says that the initial syllable is left open with the hireq vowel, with vocal shewa following. The absence of a dagesh lene in a following begadkephat letter is often cited as proof. However, this approach ignores the usual rule that a short vowel likes to be closed in an unaccented syllable.

Questions:
1. So, which do we choose? How do we account for the problems that arise?

2. And more importantly, how did this situation come about?

3. Is Modern Hebrew pronunciation influencing the situation here? And if so, should it?

Regards
Kay Christensen



  • [b-hebrew] re.: Inseparable Prepositions and that shewa, Vadim Cherny, 04/16/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page