b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: David Hamuel <davidhamuel AT sbcglobal.net>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:21:39 -0800 (PST)
@ Jim Stinehart:
> As jewishhistory.com says: “[T]here are ruins, called Seir, on
> the spot indicated, which leaves no doubt that
> Seir is derived from Jazer.”
1. What/where is the direct link?
2. You need to be more accurate; it's not
'jewishhistory.com says', but J Schwarz -- from his book
that was published in 1850! page 230:
"GAD גד
The towns of this tribe were as follows:
Jazer יעצר . Eusebius says that this place is 15
mill north from Hesban: it existed even still at
the time of Astori; but at present there
are ruins, called Seir, on the spot indicated,
which leaves no doubt the Seir is derived from Jazer..."
Best,
David Hamuel
Type Designer
Biblical Hebrew, Grammar & Cantillation Expert
Los Angeles, CA — USA
-
[b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
jimstinehart, 02/21/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
K Randolph, 02/21/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
jimstinehart, 02/21/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ, K Randolph, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
jimstinehart, 02/21/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
JimStinehart, 02/22/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ, K Randolph, 02/22/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ, David Hamuel, 02/22/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
JimStinehart, 02/23/2010
- [b-hebrew] END OF THREAD: "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ, George Athas, 02/23/2010
-
Re: [b-hebrew] "Amalek"/(MLQ vs. "Valley"/(MQ,
K Randolph, 02/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.